Nixon v United States Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Nixon v United States - Essay Exampledoubts the people of America had regarding The efficiency of a system that not except comprises of the President and the White House staff, but also extends to the office of independent counsel-its authority and its jurisdiction. (Frederick M. Kaiser, p 5). The tapes, integrity of them called The Smoking Gun which include the recorded conversations, that revealed Nixons alleged acts that were antagonistic to justice and highlighted his attempts to cover up the attempted break-in, led to a lot of public disgust for the Republican Party. Keeping in head the disastrous effect the Watergate scandal had on the public morale, the information these tapes contain must be kept away from Congressional oversight. They are not empowered with the right to have access to records or exonerate investigations. Reports have already shown the tapes were tampered with, even when in the custody of the White House. Eighteen and a half important minutes of one par ticular tape were erased in five separate segments. The privileged information contained deep down these tapes, if accessed by the above-mentioned body will further lead to the establishment of an atmosphere of political risk that has already been created due to the illegal activities of President Nixon and his staff. In all of this, President Nixon has acted in a direction contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional Government, to the great prejudice of the cause of police and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. (House Committee on the Judiciary, p 3). These tapes are instantly a matter of national security and must neither be compartmentalized nor pigeonholed as a mere political conspiracy. Congressional oversight is needed to serve many objectives and purposes. According to Frederick M. Kaiser, these include utility in the efficiency, economy, effectiveness of Governmental operations, evaluation of programs and thei r performance, protection of civil liberties